Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis C"

50-60% of patients with chronic hepatitis C are not cured by treatment with pegylated IFNα plus ribavirin. Retreatment of non-responders of previous (pegylated) IFNα plus ribavirin therapies with pegylated IFNα plus ribavirin results in a sustained response in less than 10% of the patients. Extensive analysis of IFNα signaling in cells expressing HCV proteins, in transgenic mice expressing HCV proteins, and in liver biopsies from patients with chronic hepatitis C point to STAT1 methylation as an important posttranslational modification targeted by HCV to inhibit IFNα signaling. STAT1 methylation can be increased and IFNα can be improved by adding AdoMet and betaine. The study is designed to test the hypothesis that a combination treatment with pegylated IFNα2b, ribavirin, AdoMet and betaine is superior to the current standard combination therapy with pegylated IFNα plus ribavirin.

The purpose of this study is to compare the sustained virological response rate at 24 weeks after the end of experimental treatment (induction and 72 weeks) to that of standard 48 weeks treatment with PEG-inteferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C previous unresponsive to interferon alfa monotherapy or interferon alfa/ribavirin combination therapy.

This study aims to identify the innate and adaptive immune response to zoster vaccination. Half of the participants will be individuals with chronic hepatitis C, while the other half with healthy volunteers.The innate immune signature elicited by Zoster vaccination will be characterized by RNA-seq analysis of pre- and post-vaccination RNA from whole blood. We will compare fold changes in gene expression profiles pre- versus post-vaccination in each individual, as well as between the two arms of the study. RNA-seq will be used to assess innate immune activation by evaluating the changes to the expression levels of interferon-stimulated genes pre- and post-vaccination. Adaptive immune response will be determined by the traditional correlates of protection used in previous Zoster clinical studies in addition to flow cytometry24. Correlates of protection include antibody response, interferon gamma production and the frequency of responder cells post- vaccination24. For antibody production, we will perform Zoster glycoprotein ELISA (gpELISA) targeting IgG/IgM. The number and frequency of responder cells will be characterized by flow cytometry.

Study P05063 is a 3-year long-term follow-up (LTFU) study in participants previously treated with boceprevir (BOC) or narlaprevir (NAR) in a Phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical study. Participants will be followed for up to 3.5 years after the end of their participation in the treatment protocol to document maintenance of the antiviral response (for sustained responders) and to characterize the long-term safety after use of this therapeutic regimen. LTFU procedures include collection of plasma samples for measuring Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and HCV sequence analysis. No drug therapy will be administered as part of this study.

This study will evaluate the efficacy of navigation for hepatitis C treatment in people living with both HIV and HCV with criminal justice involvement.

Follow-up for viral activity, changes in liver function and safety in patients with no SVR24 in feeder studies

Achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients infected with HCV genotype 1, cirrhosis, and early clinical decompensation using 12 weeks of Olysio/Sovaldi/Ribavirin (or known as: Simeprevir(SMV)/Sofosbuvir(SOF)/Ribavirin (RBV). Hepatic improvement during and after Simeprevir(SMV)/Sofosbuvir(SOF)/Ribavirin(RBV) treatment using a new test of liver function, HepQuant-SHUNT.

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the durability of Sustained virologic response (SVR) in participants who achieved SVR at last post-therapy visit of parent studies (LPVPS) with NCT Numbers NCT02569710 and NCT02765490.

This study seeks to implement and evaluate a data-driven case navigation system for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among persons who are either actively injecting drugs or who are receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST). The study will use data from a previously developed patient registry system to identify patients for study recruitment, and use monthly updates of registry data to organize and direct patient navigation services for those individuals assigned to the treatment group. Patients assigned to the control group will also be eligible to receive HCV treatment, but will otherwise receive usual care. This study has a parallel, randomized unblinded, case/control design in which eligible patients are assigned at baseline to either a registry-directed patient navigation system (case) or to usual care (control), characterized in terms of demographic and sub-population variables, and then compared after 12 months on two categories of outcomes; (1) attainment of care cascade milestones; and (2) treatment initiation, adherence, and virologic response. The study is designed and powered to answer two primary hypotheses (H1 & H2): H1: As compared to those randomized to usual care (control), those randomized to the registry directed patient navigation arm (case) will be more likely to complete all pretreatment HCV care milestones as defined by a higher proportion completing all four pre-treatment care cascade outcomes. H2: As compared to the control group, a significantly higher proportion of those randomized to the case group will achieve a sustained viral response.

Hepatitis C (HCV) infected patients are often in need for an antidepressant. The introduction of Direct Acting Antivirals such as telaprevir has greatly improved treatment outcome of HCV infected patients.Telaprevir has been studied with one antidepressant, escitalopram: plasma concentrations of the antidepressant were reduced by 35% and without dose adjustment this may lead to inadequate treatment of depressive symptoms. There is a need for more data on telaprevir drug interactions with other antidepressants. For a number of reasons, paroxetine may be a good candidate for use together with telaprevir-containing HCV treatment. The interaction between paroxetine and telaprevir has not been studied before.