
HEM-iSMART-C: Ruxolitinib + Venetoclax + Dexamethasone + Cyclophosphamide and Cytarabine in Pediatric...
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemiain Relapse4 moreHEM-iSMART is a master protocol which investigates multiple investigational medicinal products in children, adolescents and young adults (AYA) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) ALL and LBL. Sub-protocol C is a phase I/II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib and venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine in children and AYA with R/R ped ALL/LBL whose tumor present with alterations in the IL7R/JAK-STAT pathway.

Intratumoral Gemcitabine, Paclitaxel, Carboplatine and Intravenous Nivolumab for Locally Recurrence...
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and NeckPaclitaxel2 morePatients with locally recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) after Chemotherapy and immunotherapy have a very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Intratumoral chemotherapy (ITC) with cisplatin and epinephrine in order to increase the local cisplatin retention lead to a 50 % response rate in several studies but was given up due to the poor local tolerance with frequent necrosis of the peritumoral tissues. Gemcitabine, carboplatin and paclitaxel (GCP) are used in advanced SCCHN. These chemotherapies seem to be interesting options for intratumoral infusion: their different effect could lead to avoid chemotherapy resistance with a good tolerance profile, without tissue necrosis profile. The other major option for recurrent SCCHN is immunotherapy by Nivolumab, an anti PD-1 with a 13% mediane response rate. Nevertheless, the failure of this treatment stay unclear, but immunosuppressive action of the tumour is suspected. The presence of tumoral antigen could lead to better response to immunotherapy; association of chemotherapy and immunotherapy seems a promosing association to avoid treatment resistance as cytotoxic release tumoral antigen; it could also be associated to an abscopal effect. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of ITC using GCP in LOCAL recurrent SCCHN treated by nivolumab.

Efficacy and Safety of KN026 in Combination With HB1801 in the First-line Treatment of Subjects...
First-line Treatment of HER2-positive Recurrent or Metastatic Breast CancerThis is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter, phase Ш clinical study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of KN026 in combination with HB1801 to trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab and docetaxel in the first-line treatment of subjects with HER2-positive recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. The statistical assumption for this study is superiority. The primary study endpoint was PFS as assessed by Blinded Independ Review Committee (BIRC).

A Phase III Study of AK104 as Adjuvant Therapy in HCC With High Risk of Recurrence After Curative...
Hepatocellular CarcinomaThe efficacy and safety of AK104 as adjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma of high recurrence risk after curative resection.

A Study of BL-B01D1 + SI-B003 in Patients With Unresectable, Locally Advanced or Recurrent Metastatic...
Locally Advanced or Recurrent Metastatic HER-2 Negative Breast CancerPrimary objective: To explore the efficacy of BL-B01D1+SI-B003 combination therapy in inoperable locally advanced or recurrent metastatic HER-2 patients Efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with negative breast cancer, and the optimal dose and administration mode of the combination are further explored. Secondary objective: To explore PK, immunogenicity and drug-drug interaction (DDI) of BL-B01D1 and SI-B003.

α-Mangostin Hydrogel Film With Chitosan Alginate Base for Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (RAS)
Recurrent Aphthous StomatitisRecurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (RAS) is experienced by almost everyone and appears suddenly. Even though the risk of death due to the condition is small, its presence can make a person feel uncomfortable eating, drinking, and talking so there will be a decrease in the quality of a person's life in their daily lives. Recently, α-Mangostin (α-M) from mangosteen rind (Garcinia mangostana L) has been shown its effect to reduce oral mucosal sores on RAS in preclinical studies in rats. Therefore, research is needed to prove the benefits (efficacy) and safety of therapy in the form of a hydrogel film patch/plaster film with a chitosan alginate base as a carrier for α-Mangostin for the treatment of RAS patients.

A Clinical Trial on Combined (Neo-)Adjuvant Intravenous Plus Intracranial Administration of Ipilimumab...
Recurrent GlioblastomaThe goal of this phase I interventional study is to determine the safety and feasibility of the proposed investigational (neo-)adjuvant treatment regimen in patients with resectable reccurent glioblastoma. Participants will: receive neo-adjuvant administration of intravenous immunotherapy followed by a maximal safe neurosurgical resection afterwards, immunotherapy will be injected into the brain tissue followed by insertion of an Ommaya reservoir postoperatively, administration of immunotherapy will be continued

Blinatumomab Prevents Recurrence of R/R ALL After Allo-HSCT
LeukemiaLymphoidThe goal of this phase I/II clinical trial is to test in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) patients undergoing allogeneic hemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The main question it aims to answer is: • The efficacy and safety of blinatumomab maintenance therapy in reducing the recurrence rate a in R/R ALL patients after allo-HSCT. Participants will take intravenous blinatumomab after allo-HSCT. The dose of one course was as follows: day 1-2: 8ug/day, continuous intravenous drip for 24 hours, day 3-7: 16ug/day, continuous intravenous drip for 24 hours. Treatment with blinatumomab was initiated within 60 to 90 days after transplantation and was administered bimonthly until 1 year after transplantation. Dexamethasone 20mg was administered 1 hour before administration on days 1 and 3 to prevent adverse events.

Enzalutamide and M9241 in PET Positive Recurrent Prostate Cancer (pprPC) Without Testosterone Lowering...
Prostate CancerRecurrent Prostate Cancer1 moreBackground: Prostate cancer may return after treatment in 30,000 to 50,000 people each year. There is no clear best way to treat these people. Better treatments are needed. Objective: To test a study drug (enzalutamide), both alone and combined with a second drug (M9241), in people with prostate cancer that returned after treatment. Eligibility: People aged 18 years and older with prostate cancer that returned after treatment. Design: Participants will be screened. They will have a physical exam, with blood tests. All their urine will be collected for 24 hours. They will have imaging scans of their chest, abdomen, pelvis, and bones. Their ability to perform everyday activities will be assessed. They may opt to give a stool sample. Participants will be treated in 4-week cycles. Enzalutamide is a pill taken by mouth once a day, every day. All participants will be given a supply of this drug to take at home. M9241 is injected under the skin once a month, on the first day of each cycle. Half of the participants will receive both drugs. All participants will visit the clinic once a month. Each visit should last no more than 8 hours. Blood and urine tests will be repeated. All participants will receive the study treatment for 3 cycles. Some participants may need 3 more cycles of treatment with enzalutamide only. This re-treatment can be done only once. Participants will have a follow-up visit 1 month after they finish treatment. After that, they will have visits every 6 weeks for up to 5 years. Imaging scans and blood tests will be repeated.

The Role of IL-23-Responsive Immune Cell Subsets in Post-Operative Recurrence in Patients With Crohn's...
Crohn´s DiseaseInflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD), constitute a group of debilitating chronic diseases that profoundly impact patient quality of life and incurs large costs in terms of treatment and lost productivity. Incidence of IBD is rising worldwide, and there is a pressing clinical need for development of new therapies. Discovery and development of effective therapies to treat IBDs depend first on a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms, including how proinflammatory cells proliferate unchecked. It has been established that the cytokine interleukin (IL)-23 plays a pivotal role in IBD pathophysiology and antibodies targeting IL-23 are currently in late stage development for the treatment of both CD and ulcerative colitis (UC). IL-23 is part of the IL-12 family of cytokines (which includes IL-12, IL-27 and IL-35). The p40 subunit is shared among IL-23 and IL-12; the p19 subunit is unique to IL-23. Thus far, the efficacy of selective anti-IL-23 blockade (via anti-p19 antibodies) appears 5-10% better with respect to clinical and endoscopic outcomes than targeting both IL-23 and IL-12 using anti-p40 antibodies. Understanding the effects of IL-23 (and IL-12) in IBDs requires identification of the most relevant immune cells that respond to these cytokines. One likely cell type controlled by the IL-23 pathway are innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). ILC3s (a subset of ILCs) are dominant in healthy intestinal tissue and capable of producing IL-22 which maintain intestinal epithelial homeostasis. Disturbances in the amounts of IL-22 caused by changes in the stimulatory cytokine IL-23 in tissues, may therefore cause inflammatory responses. IL-23 may facilitate the IL-12-induced shift of ILC3s to ILC1s which are contributing to the disease-causing chronic inflammation. The DIVE 23 project is designed to understand the role of IL-23 in human IBD, in particular CD. It is hypothesized that IL-23R+ cells in the gut, are drivers of chronic inflammation in CD and determine the impact of IL-23 inhibition. To this end the investigators plan to extensively characterize the IL-23-responsive cell populations in inflamed and non-inflamed intestinal tissues of CD patients with postoperative recurrence in order to identify IL-23-responsive immune cell populations that are associated with disease activity. Patients will be treated in routine medical practice with biological agents and will undergo a second ileocolonoscopy 12-16 weeks later to investigate the impact of the different interventions on the mucosal immunology driving CD.