Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis"

This is a phase IV, single-arm, open-label, multi-centre study to assess the efficacy of TDF in Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) subjects following failure of multiple Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). The study will enrol 200 CHB subjects following failure of multiple NAs. Subjects will be assessed for eligibility at a screening visit, with eligible subjects returning for a baseline assessment after approximately 4 weeks (Screening phase). In the treatment phase all enrolled subjects will receive open label TDF at a dose of 300 milligrams (mg) orally once daily. All the eligible study subjects will undergo safety and efficacy assessments every 12 weeks for a total of 14 visits. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, the oral pro-drug of tenofovir (TFV), is a nucleotide analogue that inhibits viral polymerases by direct binding and after incorporation into deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), by termination of the DNA) chain. TDF is a highly potent treatment in treatment-naïve and lamivudine (LAM) resistant CHB patients. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of TDF treatment in Chinese CHB patients following failure of multiple NAs. In addition, the study will also explore the relationship of baseline factors and early HBV DNA suppression to long-term virological response. The efficacy of TDF in multi-drug resistant patients will be analysed separately. The data generated by this study could then be used to optimize the clinical application of TDF and provide new evidence for management of the HBV infections following failure of multiple NAs. The result of this study will help Chinese physicians better manage the CHB patients following failure of multiple NAs.

The primary objectives were: To determine the effects of steady state TPV co-administered with low dose RTV on steady state PegIFN and RBV in HIV negative subjects with mild hepatic impairment (scheme A) To determine the effects of steady state of pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and RBV on steady state pharmacokinetics of TPV co-administered with low dose RTV in HIV negative subjects with mild hepatic impairment (scheme A) To determine the pharmacokinetics of single dose and steady state TPV/r 500/200 mg in subjects with moderate hepatic insufficiency (scheme B)

To assess the antiviral effect, safety and pharmacokinetics of rising doses of 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, 450 mg, 650 mg, 900 mg oral BILB 1941 ZW administered Q8H in a polyethyleneglycol 400 (PEG 400): distilled water: Tromethamine (TRIS) drinking solution for five days to patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection

The purpose of Part 1 is to inform dose selection for use of alisporivir and EDP239 in combination and obtain initial safety data for co-administration of alisporivir and EDP239 to support future treatment studies in patients. The purpose of Part 2 is to inform the drug-drug interaction potential of EDP239 more broadly and possibly facilitate the interpretation of lower than expected alisporivir concentrations in Part 1, if observed.

This open-label study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of co-formulated ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir co-administered with sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin administered for either 4 or 6 weeks in treatment naive adults with chronic HCV-genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis

This is an expanded access, multicenter, national, open-label, and non-randomized study to analyze the safety of peginterferon alfa-2a in participants with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive and HBeAg negative chronic HBV infection. All participants will receive 48 weeks treatment of peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, followed by a 24 week treatment-free follow-up period.

This is a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial of standard of care vs. standard of care + pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®) among patients with a clinical diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis and DF≥32.

This is a 3-part study of Ruzasvir (MK-8408) for participants with hepatitis C infection. Successive participants will be enrolled as dose levels are evaluated to find the maximum safe and well tolerated dose of Ruzasvir. Part I will be for participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 (GT3) and will run first: Part II will be for participants with HCV genotype 1a (GT1a), and Part III will be for participants with HCV genotype 2b (GT2b). Parts II and III may run concurrently. The primary study hypothesis is that a safe and tolerable dose of Ruzasvir that reduces viral load will be found to support further clinical investigation.

In this study, participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (GT1) who failed prior direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy will receive Grazoprevir (MK-5172) + Elbasvir (MK-8742) + Ribavirin (RBV) to evaluate sustained virologic response (SVR) using this drug combination.

The primary objective is to study the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of boceprevir vs. telaprevir in HCV treatment, within the VA population. The secondary objective: Resource use: recording of differences in resource use, such as direct costs (e.g., drug acquisition costs) and other indirect cost (e.g., staff utilization etc.) as the study will not only derive data by comparing those two drugs but also study the effect on different treatment lengths.